New Computers
For the past few weeks I have been assembling new household computers. For the past year I have been using an older Dell Dimension GX-Series as the main computer for radio and web development. It is an old-style Socket 478 Pentium running at 2+ GHz. HRD and background tasks often ran the machine into the 100% realm and HRD’s performance suffered. However I had not planned on upgrading machines or even replacing the machine since I could use my Dell Studio laptop for web development and for the radio.
I also do some video editing for our local congregation so that the weekly sermon is available on the church web site. In doing the weekly edits, I found that even the Studio with its T6500 2.1 GHz processor was not really as fast as I wanted. It was taking too long to create the clip I needed. So, I needed ; ) a faster machine.
I opted to build a new Socket 775 machine with a 2.9 GHz Pentium Dual-Core (E6500) processor using a 32-bit XP operating system. The machine worked very well and cut the time down to a more reasonable area but I figured I could do better if I overclocked the CPU. That worked, the time was cut down to roughly 75 minutes to load the .VODs and another 90 to write the final clip. This was more reasonable but still not fast enough to get things done on a Sunday afternoon after church. 165 minutes was still better than I had been doing with the Studio laptop but it was still too long.
After using the new computer for a couple of weeks, I decided to investigate replacing the Pentium with a Quad. What could I expect in performance gains if I moved to a Quad? And which Quad would be a better choice? I searched and researched the available 775 Quads and determined that the best would be a Q9550 but the best price I could find was more than I really wanted to pay. My second choice was the Q8400 but it was a 2.55 GHz chip – slower than the E6500 so many tasks other than video editing would suffer and run at roughly 85% of what I had grown used to.
I still don’t know if HRD is multi-processor aware but I did find that many hardware hackers had pushed the Q8400 to 3.4 Gz with little problem other than heat. If my chosen motherboard could handle overclocking the Q8400 to roughly 3 GHz without problems, I would not suffer any execution slowdowns. I tested the overclock capabilities of the MB by setting the overclocking on automatic and going for a 15% OC on the E6500. That worked so I knew that the MB could provide some OC capabilities for the new processor.
All that remained was the heat issue. The E6500, when OCed to 3.2 GHz during a video creation would hit 61 Degrees C. Not really good but under the 70 deg C limit for the processor. That was for a 65 Watt cpu, what would happen when I put a 95 Watt cpu under the same load. Would it break the 70 degree mark? Being chicken, I opted for a non-stock cooler for the quad. I chose a massive cooler that was supposed to be able to handle a 130 Watt cpu at full load. I figured that the OCed quad would be hitting about 130 to 150 watts at full load so the cooler would probably work. It does…under 90% load at 3.1 GHz, the cpu never gets over 42 degrees C. The new processor and DDR3 memory cuts the overall load and create time to roughly 1.5 hours and normal tasks work at roughly the same speed as with the E6500.
So what does this mean to the old 478 Pentium machine? It means that I now have a spare E6500 and memory. I need a MB, case, and power supply to create a fast machine for the radio. I purchased a less expensive case, bought another MB like the first one, and bought a new 500W PS. I reused a CD burner and hard drive I had from an earlier machine so I basically got by with only having to buy the case, MB, and PS to create the new machine. In both instances I used mATX MB so I didn’t have to buy expensive Radeon display boards. I can add them later if I find I need to upgrade the video.
Yesterday I finished the radio machine except for a new after-market cooler which should be in today. It works well and doesn’t slow down when other tasks are running.